Kotori 2?(>5)
Azusa 20
Ritsuko 18
Takane 17
Makoto 16
Haruka 16
Yukiho 16
Ryo 15
Eri 15
Chihaya 15
Hibiki 15
Miki 14
Iori 14
Yayoi 13
Ai 13
Ami 12
Mami 12
Does anyone know why these particular ages were picked? Even for Jupiter the age goes from 14 to 20.

So while for Ami and Mami they're so young looking and bratty that it's believable that they could be 12. But Miki 14? Before I looked it up just now I could've sworn she was at least 16. Makoto too.
I mean each of these numbers were deliberate and thoughtful corporate/artistic decisions made by group consensus of a number of directors/executives/chiefs entrusted with the success of the franchise. I have no idea though what compelled them to choose this range or make certain decisions regarding the ages that seem contrary to the profit-motive.
In other words, I'm familiar enough with Iori and Yayoi to think that they also should be younger, but they could have been 15 or even 16 and still be believable. But Takane, Makoto, Chihaya, Hibiki, Miki and some others could
easily pass for 18 (Especially Takane, until I looked it up just now I could've sworn I had read she was 19 from somewhere). Why make them younger?

Why make Azusa 20 when she could be 18? What reasoning could there be for such a decision?
So in considering some possibilities I thought: well what if they were assuming a demarcation of 16, then maybe the system they were operating with is something like:
18+ Ladies
16-18 Young Ladies
>16 Girls
Which still doesn't explain how Miki is 14? I mean individual physical traits vary greatly and certainly some kids look younger or older than they really are. But why make the conscious deliberate decision to make Miki 14? Are they trying to fill every single number from 12 to 18 or something? They already have variety of personality and appearance, does variety of "numbers" count for something?
Because consider the
$$$ angle, wouldn't idols be more marketable if they were at least the age of majority? (It's 20 in Japan but they plan to (reasonably) lower it to 18). Is there some stigma for girls over 18?

I mean I know Christmas Cake (<25) get picked on in fiction as well as IRL, but 18??
Is it that they are going for the whole family-friendly/acceptable thing, so for a SFW game the agency employs females of any age including below or above 18 and everything is fine? But then how could that working paradigm be justified with G4U?

I just looked it up and AKB48 is also 14 to 20+ ??
The idea I'm thinking of but can't really believe 100% is that the stories for the characters (including ages) were written beforehand, and for once (because it's SOOOO rare) the corporate-types kept the original ages for the sake of artistic faithfulness....? But the idea of corporate-types doing anything that could reduce profit seems laughably unlikely... Or maybe the word
idol/アイドル itself is of a certain age group, thus justifying the variety? Other than that... nothing else comes to mind...
Maybe the veteran fans here have some ideas about this? (And here's hoping this topic doesn't become another fudgestorm!! *crosses fingers* >_<)
Here is a chart I just found (lol 9 to 31...), although it seems all the numbers are bigger by one compared to the info on the wiki:
Again this is not criticism or discontent, I'm only curious if anyone knows what the reasoning could be behind such arguably anti-profit decisions? Nothing negative, only curious!***EDIT*** Dangit I messed up the poll and hit enter by accident and I don't think users can vote for more than one option... and I don't see any way to change that attribute in the "Edit Poll" section, unless a mod would be kind enough to enable voting for more than one choice.

***EDIT*** Ok BIG THANKS to Yunabeco for fixing the poll! I reset the votes to 0 so now you can vote again for more than one choice. Thanks again to Yunabeco!

